Introduction
Members
of the genus Megachile are among the best known bees (O’Toole
& Raw 1991). Here I have followed Michener et al (1994, 2000)
and treated the group as a single genus combining Megachile
with Chalicodoma. Most are called "leaf-cutter bees"
because the females cut leaves and petals to line their nests. Others
are the "mason bees" because they construct their nests
with resin, mud or leaves chewed into pulp. The neotropical species
are from half to three times the length of a honeybee.
The
aim of this inventory is to disentangle some of the great confusion
that exists over the identification of the species of Megachile
of the Neotropics. Identification to subgenus and knowledge of the
geographical distributions of the members of the subgenus substantially
reduces the number of options and assists identification to species
or species group. I hope easier identification will stimulate studies
on the bees’ biology and enable researchers to better assess
their roles as pollinators.
For
each species the subgenus is indicated, the valid name and changes
of names are listed and information on the bee’s biology and
its geographical distribution are given. The subgenera are indicated
to which 395 neotropical species belong, including 9 Old World species
introduced to the region during historical times. Dalla Torre (1896)
listed 92 neotropical species now included in the genus Megachile.
Three neotropical species were erroneously placed at some time in
the genus Megachile. Their present statuses are indicated
below. There are also five nomina nudae. Nomenclatural questions
of subgenus or species groups and of subspecies are not discussed.
Species
of Megachile can be placed with certainty in their correct
subgenera only by examining the type specimens. Nonetheless, a number
of authors have done so without stating the situation. In order
to improve the authority of this work, to date I have examined 246
type specimens of neotropical Megachile. In all the cases
where “Examined” is stated I have seen the holotype.
In those cases where I have not done so, the basis of my decision
is clearly stated.
|